n
1837, Danish author, Hans Christian Andersen, wrote a
wonderful fairy tale which he titled The
Emperor's New Clothes. It may be the
very first example of the power of political
correctness. It is the story of the Ruler of a distant
land who was so enamored of his appearance and his
clothing that he had a different suit for every hour of
the day.
One day two rogues arrived in town, claiming to be
gifted weavers. They convinced the Emperor that they
could weave the most wonderful cloth, which had a
magical property. The clothes were only visible to
those who were completely pure in heart and spirit.
The Emperor was impressed and ordered the weavers to
begin work immediately. The rogues, who had a deep
understanding of human nature, began to feign work on
empty looms.
Minister after minister went to view the new clothes
and all came back exhorting the beauty of the cloth on
the looms even though none of them could see a thing.
Finally a grand procession was planned for the
Emperor to display his new finery. The Emperor went to
view his clothes and was shocked to see absolutely
nothing, but he pretended to admire the fabulous cloth,
inspect the clothes with awe, and, after disrobing, go
through the motions of carefully putting on a suit of
the new garments.
Under a royal canopy the Emperor appeared to the
admiring throng of his people - - all of whom cheered
and clapped because they all knew the rogue weavers'
tale and did not want to be seen as less than pure of
heart.
But, the bubble burst when an innocent child loudly
exclaimed, for the whole kingdom to hear, that the
Emperor had nothing on at all. He had no clothes.
That tale seems to me very like the way this nation
was led to war.
We were told that we were threatened by weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq, but they have not been seen.
We were told that the throngs of Iraqi's would
welcome our troops with flowers, but no throngs or
flowers appeared.
We were led to believe that Saddam Hussein was
connected to the attack on the Twin Towers and the
Pentagon, but no evidence has ever been produced.
We were told in 16 words that Saddam Hussein tried to
buy "yellow cake" from Africa for production of nuclear
weapons, but the story has turned into empty air.
We were frightened with visions of mushroom clouds,
but they turned out to be only vapors of the mind.
We were told that major combat was over but 101 [as
of October 17] Americans have died in combat since that
proclamation from the deck of an aircraft carrier by our
very own Emperor in his new clothes.
Our emperor says that we are not occupiers, yet we
show no inclination to relinquish the country of Iraq to
its people.
Those who have dared to expose the nakedness of the
Administration's policies in Iraq have been subjected to
scorn. Those who have noticed the elephant in the room
-- that is, the fact that this war was based on
falsehoods – have had our patriotism questioned. Those
who have spoken aloud the thought shared by hundreds of
thousands of military families across this country, that
our troops should return quickly and safely from the
dangers half a world away, have been accused of
cowardice. We have then seen the untruths, the
dissembling, the fabrication, the misleading inferences
surrounding this rush to war in Iraq wrapped quickly in
the flag.
The right to ask questions, debate, and dissent is
under attack. The drums of war are beaten ever louder
in an attempt to drown out those who speak of our
predicament in stark terms.
Even in the Senate, our history and tradition of
being the world's greatest deliberative body is being
snubbed. This huge spending bill has been rushed
through this chamber in just one month. There were just
three open hearings by the Senate Appropriations
Committee on $87 billion, without a single outside
witness called to challenge the Administration's line.
Ambassador Bremer went so far as to refuse to return
to the Appropriations Committee to answer additional
questions because, and I quote: "I don't have time. I'm
completely booked, and I have to get back to Baghdad to
my duties."
Despite this callous stiff-arm of the Senate and its
duties to ask questions in order to represent the
American people, few dared to voice their opposition to
rushing this bill through these halls of Congress.
Perhaps they were intimidated by the false claims that
our troops are in immediate need of more funds.
But the time has come for the sheep-like political
correctness which has cowed members of this Senate to
come to an end.
The Emperor has no clothes. This entire adventure in
Iraq has been based on propaganda and manipulation.
Eighty-seven billion dollars is too much to pay for the
continuation of a war based on falsehoods.
Taking the nation to war based on misleading rhetoric
and hyped intelligence is a travesty and a tragedy. It
is the most cynical of all cynical acts. It is
dangerous to manipulate the truth. It is dangerous
because once having lied, it is difficult to ever be
believed again. Having misled the American people and
stampeded them to war, this Administration must now
attempt to sustain a policy predicated on falsehoods.
The President asks for billions from those same citizens
who know that they were misled about the need to go to
war. We misinformed and insulted our friends and allies
and now this Administration is having more than a little
trouble getting help from the international community.
It is perilous to mislead.
The single-minded obsession of this Administration to
now make sense of the chaos in Iraq, and the continuing
propaganda which emanates from the White House painting
Iraq as the geographical center of terrorism is
distracting our attention from Afghanistan and the 60
other countries in the world where terrorists hide. It
is sapping resources which could be used to make us
safer from terrorists on our own shores. The body armor
for our own citizens still has many, many chinks. Have
we forgotten that the most horrific terror attacks in
history occurred right here at home!! Yet, this
Administration turns back money for homeland security,
while the President pours billions into security for
Iraq. I am powerless to understand or explain such a
policy.
I have tried mightily to improve this bill. I twice
tried to separate the reconstruction money in this bill,
so that those dollars could be considered separately
from the military spending. I offered an amendment to
force the Administration to craft a plan to get other
nations to assist the troops and formulate a plan to get
the U.N. in, and the U.S. out, of Iraq. Twice I tried
to rid the bill of expansive, flexible authorities that
turn this $87 billion into a blank check. The American
people should understand that we provide more foreign
aid for Iraq in this bill, $20.3 billion, than we
provide for the rest of the entire world! I attempted
to remove from this bill billions in wasteful programs
and divert those funds to better use. But, at every
turn, my efforts were thwarted by the vapid argument
that we must all support the requests of the Commander
in Chief.
I cannot stand by and continue to watch our
grandchildren become increasingly burdened by the
billions that fly out of the Treasury for a war and a
policy based largely on propaganda and prevarication.
We are borrowing $87 billion to finance this adventure
in Iraq. The President is asking this Senate to pay for
this war with increased debt, a debt that will have to
be paid by our children and by those same troops that
are currently fighting this war. I cannot support
outlandish tax cuts that plunge our country into
potentially disastrous debt while our troops are
fighting and dying in a war that the White House chose
to begin.
I cannot support the continuation of a policy that
unwisely ties down 150,000 American troops for the
foreseeable future, with no end in sight.
I cannot support a President who refuses to authorize
the reasonable change in course that would bring
traditional allies to our side in Iraq.
I cannot support the politics of zeal and "might
makes right" that created the new American arrogance and
unilateralism which passes for foreign policy in this
Administration.
I cannot support this foolish manifestation of the
dangerous and destabilizing doctrine of preemption that
changes the image of America into that of a reckless
bully.
The emperor has no clothes. And our former allies
around the world were the first to loudly observe it.
I shall vote against this bill because I cannot
support a policy based on prevarication. I cannot
support doling out 87 billion of our hard-earned tax
dollars when I have so many doubts about the wisdom of
its use.
I began my remarks with a fairy tale. I shall close
my remarks with a horror story, in the form of a quote
from the book Nuremberg Diaries, written
by G.M. Gilbert, in which the author interviews Hermann
Goering.
"We got around to the subject of war again and I said
that, contrary to his attitude, I did not think that the
common people are very thankful for leaders who bring
them war and destruction.
". . . But, after all, it is the leaders of
the country who determine the policy and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a
democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a
Communist dictatorship.
"There is one difference," I pointed out. "In a
democracy the people have some say in the matter through
their elected representatives, and in the United States
only Congress can declare wars."
"Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding
of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell
them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists
for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
danger. It works the same way in any country."